Archive for April, 2007

41st District Candidate Debate

Monday, April 30th, 2007

Tonight on WGMD Radio, 92.7 FM, the 3 official candidates for the open 41st District House seat, faced each other in a live, on air debate on The Randy Nelson Show. They had to field question pertaining to the Indian River Power Plant, immigration, school prayer and taxes, among other things. Many of the questions came from our own WGMD listening audience.

You can listen to audio of the entire debate between Lynn Bullock (D), Greg Hastings (R) and John Burton (I), and hosted by WGMD’s own Randy Nelson HERE.

debatepic_1.jpg
Back row left to right: Lynn Bullock (D), Greg Hastings (R), John Burton (I) Front: WGMD’s Randy Nelson

After the debate, I spoke with former State Representative John Atkins, who resigned that 41st District seat amid scandal and under pressure last month. Atkins had declined to participate in the debate. I asked him if he was endorsing any candidate, or if he was going to back the write in campaign that seems to be gaining steam in the 41st:

“I was told to ‘go home and keep your mouth shut’ and that’s just what I’ve done.” - former State Representative John Atkins

I also asked Mr. Atkins what he thought of the write in campaign and the signs cropping up all over the District:

“My record stands for itself and there’s obviously still support for me.” - former State Representative John Atkins

The special election to fill the seat vacated by John Atkins is this Saturday, May 5th. Any write in votes will not be tallied until Monday, May 7th. WGMD will keep you up to date on this story as it unfolds, and we’ll be posting highlights of tonight’s debate.

DEBATE HIGHLIGHTS:

Listen to the 3 candidates talk about school prayer:

GREG HASTINGS

JOHN BURTON

LYNN BULLOCK

Debate Reminder

Monday, April 30th, 2007

The debate between the 3 declared candidates for the 41st District House seat left vacant by former State Representative John Atkins, will be tonight at 5:00 p.m. on The Randy Nelson Show, on 92.7 FM, WGMD. We’ll be posting the podcast as soon as it’s available.

Not At H.O. Brittingham

Monday, April 30th, 2007

In the past week there have been on air calls about H.O. Brittingham Elementary School in Milton, having a gay awareness program for their students. I spoke with Mrs. Cathy Petitgout, the Principal of H.O. Brittingham, to get the scoop.

“No. We have not had a program like that.”
- Cathy Petitgout, Principal, H.O. Brittingham Elementary School

She added that the last program at the school was April 19, when theater students from Cape Henlopen High School preformed, “Not Quite the True Story of Robin Hood.”

George Tenet Tries to Save His Butt

Sunday, April 29th, 2007

Today I was watching The Chris Matthews Show, and on Matthew’s panel was Anne Kornblut from the Washington Post. The topic was former CIA Director George Tenet’s new book, At the Center of the Storm, and, of course, Tenet’s infamous “slam dunk” comment. Kornblut said something that kind of surprised me, since she is from the Post, about how we don’t know where the “slam dunk” comment originated. Well, actually, we do. It came from a 2004 book called Plan of Attack by the Washington Post’s own Bob Woodward. Here’s a little taste of Woodward’s book from the Post back in 2004:

McLaughlin’s version used communications intercepts, satellite photos, diagrams and other intelligence. “Nice try,” Bush said when the CIA official was finished, according to the book. “I don’t think this quite — it’s not something that Joe Public would understand or would gain a lot of confidence from.”

He then turned to Tenet, McLaughlin’s boss, and said, “I’ve been told all this intelligence about having WMD, and this is the best we’ve got?”

“It’s a slam-dunk case,” Tenet replied, throwing his arms in the air. Bush pressed him again. “George, how confident are you?”

“Don’t worry, it’s a slam dunk,” Tenet repeated.

Tenet later told associates he should have said the evidence on weapons was not ironclad, according to Woodward.

Now, if Kornblut is saying that we don’t know who Woodward got the comment from, and that makes it suspect because Woodward can’t tell when he’s being lied to and used as a political pawn, I guess the title of this piece should have been: “Ann Kornblut from The Washington Post Thinks Bob Woodward from The Washington Post is an Idiot,” instead.

And, I’m confused, are we all supposed to look towards Tenet as some fountain of good information now that he’s attacking the Bush Administration? Let’s face it, when it really counted and American lives were on the line (9/11 and the Iraq War for example), his agency was caught with their collective finger up their…nose.

Basically, Tenet is saying that his comment was taken out of context by, of course, the usual suspects, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, etc….

A former U.S. spy chief accused President Bush’s administration of ruining his reputation by misusing a “slam dunk” comment he made during a White House meeting ahead of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Former CIA Director George Tenet told CBS Television’s “60 Minutes” that the administration leaked his comment as opposition to the war grew when no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq….

Tenet said his comment did not refer to whether Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, but related to what information could be used to make a public case for the war.

The “slam-dunk” comment first surfaced in journalist Bob Woodward’s 2004 book, “Plan of Attack,” which portrayed Tenet as assuring Bush that finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq would be a virtual certainty.

“We can put a better case together for a public case. That’s what I meant,” Tenet told “60 Minutes.”

What? So what Tenet really said in that meeting was that the CIA could put together a “public case” for the American people about why we needed to go to war with Iraq, risking American lives and the bloodshed that comes with war, and that “public case” would be so convincing that it was a “slam dunk” Americans would buy it. Yeah, that’s much better.

And I love this quote from Tenet:

“And the hardest part of all this has been just listening to this for almost three years, listening to the vice president go on ‘Meet the Press’ on the fifth year of 9/11 and say, ‘Well, George Tenet said ’slam dunk,’ as if he needed me to say ’slam dunk’ to go to war,” Tenet said.

I think I hear the world’s smallest violin in the background. No wonder the CIA was so screwed up. Still is. I would imagine it will take a few decades of work to bounce back from lame leadership like that.

What Cheney and the Administration needed, Mr. Tenet, was a functioning CIA with good intelligence and a real leader running it, not some useless “yes” man.

It’s apparent that Tenet is trying to salvage a shred of something from his career in the CIA, and somehow he thinks that saying his “slam dunk” comment was “out of context” will make up for the agency he ran having it’s head up it’s butt for years. Think about all of the huge intelligence failures we had with Tenet at the helm: The 9/11 attack planning and the attack itself…failing to get Bin Laden through the Clinton and Bush years…blowing up a Sudanese aspirin factory, or blowing up a Sudanese VX nerve gas factory and not having the necessary male parts to stand up and say it was the right thing to do….the missile missing Saddam Hussein the first night of the Iraq War in March of 2003….the USS Cole bombing…Iraq’s WMD…I’m going to get the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome typing this list….

41st District Race Heats Up

Saturday, April 28th, 2007

On this Monday, April 30th at 5:00 p.m. make sure you tune into WGMD 92.7 FM for the debate between 41st District candidates Lynn Bullock (D), Greg Hastings (R), and John Burton (I), on the Randy Nelson Show. We will post the podcast of the debate as soon as it’s available.

And apparently the worst news is true, the 41st will be sans alcohol (at least in some venues) on Cinco de Mayo when the polls are open. Ay Carumba!

Wait…what’s this?

write-in.jpg

…it’s a flyer being distributed around the 41st that found it’s way to WGMD….

Witness to History

Saturday, April 28th, 2007

nadjaoil.jpgNadja Merino-Kalfel describes herself as a “witness to history.” At 95, she’s lived through WWI and WWII, escaping the wrath of Hitler and ending up in New York City as a fashion illustrator for the New York Times.

nadja1.jpg

You can listen to Nadja Merino-Kalfel talk about seeing Hilter in Vienna as a young woman HERE, she gives some sage advice to the crowd on relationships HERE, and THIS is how she smoked for 80 years and kept her lungs clean, it turns out Bill Clinton was on the right track….

nadja2.jpg

At one point in Merino-Kalfel’s career she “met and mentored” Andy Warhol. You can listen to her tell the story of giving Warhol some artistic guidance HERE.

She’s also credited with co-creating the “beehive hairdo.”

Her subject matter turned to hairstyle and cosmetic illustrations and in the early 60’s she worked with Antoine de Paris to create the “beehive” hairdo.

nadjasculpt.jpg

Nadja Merino-Kalfel’s sketches, paintings and sculpture will be on display and up for sale through the end of May at the Federal Street Gallery and Espresso Bar in downtown Milton.

Interviews With 41st District Candidates

Friday, April 27th, 2007

With one week to go until the special election to fill the 41st District House seat left vacant by the resignation of John Atkins, it’s time to learn about the candidates.

Listen to Randy Nelson interview the three declared candidates for the seat.

Greg Hastings (R)

Lynn Bullock (D)

John Burton (I)

WGMD Radio will have more candidate interviews along with a debate, and we’ll post the audio ASAP….And we’ll be reporting live from Millsboro on Cinco de Mayo (aka election day).

UPDATE: The 41st District debate between the three declared candidates will be Monday, April 30, at 5:00 p.m., on the Randy Nelson Show. We’ll certainly put up that podcast as soon as it’s available.

Hey! Whose business??

Thursday, April 26th, 2007

Whoa! Wait a minute…whose idea was it to take a poll on whether Prince Harry should serve in Iraq? And where was (D), the fourth option…”none of our business”?

I’m on my way home from work when the poll results were given on WGMD and, frankly, first I was stunned and then had to laugh at the audacity of at least the “77% respondents” who said he should. Why? Oh…because he is in the army, of course. That’s not too far from our usual patter of “YEAH! Send our military in there, get the job done…” while sitting on our rumps behind a desk, a counter or digging ditches. It’s okay for anyone to go as long as “it isn’t ME”.

So I’m going to nit-pick a little. First of all, please, please get it right. Harry isn’t a “Prince of England”. He is a prince of the United Kingdom…or Great Britain…or The British Isles, take your pick but England is ONLY England while being a member of the royal family makes him a prince of not just England but Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales.

Secondly, is it any of our business to state such an opinion on another country? Isn’t that how we get ourselves in trouble, whiningly asking why aren’t we liked, time after time after time?

Three…while male members of the royal family have taken service in the armed forces as their obligation to their country and crown for multiple decades, few in direct line have ever fought in armed conflict (although in recent years Prince Andrew, Harry’s uncle, did serve in the Falkland’s during that debacle). There was a slight difference…Charles was direct heir…still is…and he did have his own heirs who follow suit if something should befall him. The queen is an octogenarian and, despite the fact that I can well see her matching her ancestor Victoria for years on the throne, should something happen to her in the near future, Charles will succeed but…he’s not that young, himself. William would be next…he is in the military and if something should happen to him, it would be Harry who would then succeed since William has no children…at least none that we know of. In other words, Harry is in the line of succession for the foreseeable future and the country probably would never agree to him being in a war zone. I suppose not too far removed from Senators and Congressmen…or a President…who advocate war, sends thousands of OTHER young men and women to fight it (and send them back for multiple tours!) but do nothing to ensure their own offspring…even once…go do what they are asking everyone else’s kid to do.

LOLOLOL!!! I’m still laughing…but I wish I knew why for what a sad lot we are. A discussion is ongoing as to why someone in THIS country…who cannot see anyone worth voting for in an election so wants to abstain…should have the right to be heard when voicing an opinion on political matters or, in fact, any matter affecting the nation. Apparently it’s believed such a person does not have the right to express such an opinion. Yet we can do so for a ruling monarch’s grandson, serving in his own…not our…country’s military? ‘Struth…give me strength

SB5 Protest at Leg Hall

Wednesday, April 25th, 2007

Yesterday, at Legislative Hall in Dover, amid the Ethics Committee goings on, there was something else occurring that you couldn’t help noticing. Anti SB5 protesters were swarming around the building, (I would say “like bees,” but that’s really not appropriate anymore, is it?), making their voices heard.

Members of “A Rose and A Prayer” were passing out flowers to legislators inside of the building and outside there was an assortment of people from around Delaware, including a bus load of students from Aquinas Academy in Bear, and even some out of state protesters.

You can listen to Megan Burgess, a teacher from Aquinas Academy, speak about her students and SB5 HERE.

sb5group.jpg

And you can listen to Donald Courtney, who came from Pennslyvania to stand up for adult stem cell research HERE. He’s the man with the hat on the far right.

Mary Jane Stratnor-Gregory, who taught Child Development at the University of Delaware, had THIS to say about conception. She’s pictured in red holding the “Defend Life” sign.

Former write-in Senate candidate, Christine O’Donnell, was on the Randy Nelson Show today discussing SB5 (among other things, she also discusses a potential Atkins write-in candidacy and throws her support behind 41st District Republican, Greg Hastings.) You can listen to what O’Donnell has to say about all of those things HERE.

Go Florida!

Wednesday, April 25th, 2007

Finally, somewhere, a long-held wish of mine might just come true.

In 2000 I became sadly disenchanted by our election process following the farce in Florida. 2004 had no desire to vote for John Kerry the Vacillator and, if possible, even less for George Bush. No-one on the ballot worth my consideration but, more importantly, trust, and I decided to abstain. It wasn’t very satisfying, I must admit…so I didn’t go to the polls.

Other people don’t go for whatever reason…weather, no ride, ambivalence but for such as myself, it was none of these. I wanted to go, I wanted to check a box saying I wanted “this person” to be our CiC, run my country, that he had earned a country’s trust…into which we willingly and knowledgeably put ours and our children’s lives…and respect for at least the next four years but, since in all conscience I could not, then select the box abstaining from voting and why…my own protest, make a statement of conscience. Yes, I could “write-in” anyone…big deal. That didn’t say “You people need to get a grip and at least offer someone with integrity, honesty, stick-to-it-ivness if you want my vote.” When I listen to candidates I listen carefully…is it too much to expect that with their platform pronouncements, their campaign promises they don’t just pay lip service but mean what they say…or, at the very least, say nothing? I might not agree entirely with my chosen candidate but I will respect whomever it is so long as they believe what they say and continue to do so…then do what they’ve said they will, not do what they said they won’t. It’s not enough for others to tell me “Well, that’s the name of the game. That’s politics…” Yes, it is. But WHY? Why do we continue to accept this ? And by voting for someone who doesn’t or won’t stand by the words they speak, we allow it to continue. Let them know if and when we “choose not to vote” or abstain. Let them know why. And if it doesn’t win a race…that’s a start.

I hope this Bill succeeds. I hope it’s the forerunner for any and all of us to be able to formally make it known the “lesser of two evils is still evil”…n’est pas? And ‘none of you are worth a plug nickel’; that it isn’t apathy or laziness or weather or better things to do that keep many of us from the polls but that ’if you are all we’ve got…not good enough!’