More Smokers Wanted
Monday, July 30th, 2007On Wednesday the 60-cent-a-pack tax increase on cigarettes will take effect.. According to the State News, this will raise the total per-pack tax to $1.15.
In 2003, Gov Minner raised the cigarette tax $0.31.. Meaning, in 2003, prior to the initial tax-raise.. smokers were paying only an extra $0.24 per pack… Still a great bit lower than the city of New York’s awesome tax-hike
from the Cato Institue in 2003: Mayor Michael Bloomberg hiked the city’s cigarette excise tax from 8 cents to $1.50 per pack. That hike, coupled with a series of recent increases in the state cigarette tax, has pushed the price of legal brand name cigarettes to more than $7.50 per pack.
It’s a paradox really, though… How can the state and it’s imfamous Quit-Line (pictured left) allow people to quit… but still bring in all of those lucrative nicotine stained tax dollars?
Ah, yes.. raise the tax more and more and more… But, what do we do when those fed up with the tax-hike then quit smoking? Which is one of Minner’s goals, right? To decrease childhood smoking? (Tell that to the family in Lone Star Steak House that I witnessed allowing their 14-year-old so enjoy that sweet Carolina smoke even more than he enjoyed that Awesome Blossom).
Wow, that does look awesome… I want to share with you an e-mail I received today on the smoking tax coming direct from my inbox to your eyes… enjoy:
Having been out of town, I return to be greeted by the States’ latest visit to the Cigarette ATM machine. Cigarette smokers already pay more taxes than other Delaware (indeed, US) citizen. Democrats in Congress are moving to add .61 cents to a pack of cigarettes.  I don’t believe that there is conclusive evidence of the health drawbacks. Cigarettes are being taxed again and again because having demonized cigarette smokers, it is a popular tax. Those who don’t foresee that the next ATM tax will be on THEIR particular vice (pleasure), have their heads stuck in sand. Politicians would happily tax alcohol and beer, however the number of those who like to drink constitutes far too many voters to irritate. Especially in an election year. From the information available, politicians view cigarette taxes as their own slush fund. They should think about killing the golden goose however. I read recently that the number of cigarette smokers have declined. The article stated - “new smokers wanted”. Recently thieves stole several thousand dollars worth of cigarettes in Magnolia, Delaware. This type of theft will probably greatly increase as it did when the first cigarette taxes arrived. It’s time (past time, really) to let up on taxing cigarettes and to work at better managing government and state finances.


Â
 
 (*sigh*)