Dr. Janet Dudley-Do-Wrong
October 24th, 2007 by Bill ColleyAs usual this morning I was scanning the globe looking for answers to life’s most difficult questions. One of which is, how do you stop violent people from killing college classmates. The answer is self defense. This is from Wednesday’s Washington Times:
On some other issues one week has passed since the racist President of Salisbury University was “outed.” One week later and this woman remains on the job.  Why? Why isn’t there a no-confidence motion from the faculty? Why has the local and national media attention waned? Is it because Dr. Janet Dudley-Eshbach is “one of them?â€Â  One of “those people?†  You would think the woman’s husband would at least take her to task. Then again I‘m not sure she’s married, however. The hyphenated last name suggests if she is, he doesn’t wear the pants in the family.
Speaking of women in pant-suits Thursday will mark two weeks since Queen Hillary was asked about my dismissal from my last talk radio show. Of which she may have had some sort of role in my departure by suggesting the radio station’s license could face a difficult renewal process. I didn’t see this interview but folks say Mrs. Rodham-Peron fumbled and said there was a misunderstanding and surely her staff would straighten all of this out. Very soon. Tomorrow will mark two weeks and not one member of that staff has telephoned offering me an explanation. Â
Dogs are dying horribly. Have you seen the stories in The News Journal? One dog found hanging, really it was just a puppy, and another friendly family dog was strangled. On national TV I saw a story about a Dahmer-in-training convicted of killing a dog by kicking it like a football. Another pervert held the dog in place as if it was a field goal try. People who torture and kill small animals eventually find pleasure in doing these things to their fellow humans. Sorry, I’m not sure these psychopaths are human because you need humanity to qualify.Â
The very nice young man hosting our Spanish language show suggests the proposal to offer a free ride to college students here illegally guarantees we keep these great young minds in this country. He tells me the tuition offer is only for the most gifted. I shared this with a friend and he wondered if your kids would get a reciprocal in Bolivia, Argentina or Costa Rica? Especially if you and your family entered those nations illegally. Speaking of which, my daughter is very gifted. Will the Democrats be giving a free trip to college?  If it’s at Salisbury U. can we decline? How will the Latino children of illegal immigrants adjust to college life at old Sal U? Especially when getting caned by Dr. Dudley-Eshbach?  Can you imagine the images on the recruiting posters? Will the illegal aliens get an opportunity to fondle the President’s daughter as in the staged photographs Dudley-Do-Wrong posted on the Internet?Â
Back when I was at college this type of behavior would’ve gotten me expelled. And that was during the dark ages known as The Reagan Era. But then I wasn’t here illegally and couldn’t gain protected status from the wacko left even then dominating academia. Someone, possibly in the words of Dudley-Eshbach, has some ‘splainin’ to do.
October 24th, 2007 at 1:32 pm
I’ve long-thought the term “male-chauvinist” had fallen by the wayside then trampled in the dirt but you, Mr. Colley, have begun a revival. I may not entirely disagree with some of your editorial but it’s really hard to want to when reading such deliveries as “You would think the woman’s husband would at least take her to task. Then again I‘m not sure she’s married, however. The hyphenated last name suggests if she is he doesn’t wear the pants in the family.” Then again. I suspect this may only be your method of getting attention and response and, of course, it does work as you can see. No…I am not now, nor have I ever been a caller to any of WGMD’s shows…for a couple of reasons but mainly, and one which does not apply to all of the hosts, is that I deal with everyone in a dignified, civil (and wherever possible) respectful manner but choose not give anyone who feels he/she needs whatever opportunity to do the opposite. Your attitude and writings toward and about women are laughable…not with you, at you…whether they are done TIC or not. Men such as yourself “don’t wear the pants in the family”…they favour chain mail and a club along with chastity belts for their women. Hey, if it works for you, fine…but don’t whine because few respect you.
October 24th, 2007 at 8:42 pm
Amen to you Nancy. I also think Mr. Bill is very rude and disrespectful . I made the mistake about a month ago in e-mailing him because he mispronounced the name of a street in Sussex County and some nice lady called him to correct him with the correct pronounciationl. He then made the remark that “I never listen to women anyway”. It seems that Marilou had told him the correct pronounciation before his broadcast. I e-mailed him just to tell him that was an unkind remark to make about not listening to women. The very next day, he mentioned my name and read my e-mail to him for everybody to hear and then went on to say that I probably had a “unhappy marriage”, I had problems, and probably always nagged my husband to “pick up your socks”. Since that day I have had absolutely no respect for the man. He is indeed one of those “male “chauvanists” of which I thought had vanished from this earth.
October 25th, 2007 at 4:12 am
Draft Cheney! We need him more than Dubai does.
October 25th, 2007 at 6:39 am
Mr. Bill probably has GEICO insurance and watches Cavemen on ABC and finds it funny.
October 25th, 2007 at 7:32 am
Oh, this is much too good to pass up and so do me a favour and read. These are my labours so please understand my work is at the centre of my life.
Addressing the woman mentioning the email about the name of the road. Gee, you didn’t say how snotty the message was and you didn’t call attention to the many callers to the program taking you to task. Bet it nearly reversed your menopause? Which is what most of these gripes are about.
As far as women in my life, it’s true, I devote most of my spare time to my daughter. It’s what my church teaches and it’s what I believe. Yet I don’t discount the 4 women I’ve been hearing from in recent months. At one point or another they were involved with me and they still stay in touch. It’s my decision in keeping the contact at friendly electronic messages and nothing more.
A friend of mine and his family are members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. He and his wife raised a large family and she stayed home and raised the children. All now grown and all successful. Mr. Hunter worked very hard to accomplish this. As a man he understood it was his calling. Understanding some women must work to assist in feeding the family he found another path. It’s called sacrifice and unheard of among the women in comfortable shoes crowd.
Women are equipped with wombs. Men aren’t. You women may be angry about it but it’s the Almighty’s design. While it isn’t based on facts I’ll offer a guess the real issue is there are so few men taking any interest in you.
October 25th, 2007 at 9:02 am
I do believe that most of us hardly care about the women in your life. I just think that you are a male chauvanist and I am entitled to my opinion. You certainly do air your opinions daily and I believe that us “menopausal” women are entltled to do the same thing, Bill. Most men would just ignore us “crazy, unhappy women” and get on with life. However, you chose to keep up the argument and that is just what I find unbecoming to you. Also, any man who blames all his unhappiness with women on the “menopause” has a lot to be desired also. Most of the time if the women are cranky, etc., it is because of something men like you have said or done. Have a wonderful day, Mr. Bill ……
October 25th, 2007 at 3:08 pm
Bucksmom, you’re not going to win this argument. Just chalk it up to part of Mr. Colleys on-air Schtick. You always have the choice to turn him off as many have. When he gets the forbidden hyphen next to his show in the ratings, I’m sure the Schtick will change.
October 26th, 2007 at 7:27 am
Bill. All of these women are frustrated because they lack a strong male figure in their lives.
October 26th, 2007 at 8:51 am
Bucksmom, you make a good point re the “menopausal” observation. Those men who ass-ume their problems with women are hormonal or ‘womb’ related…whether before, during or after menopause…seem to do so because it is unfathomable to them that women can (and do) think for themselves and are entitled to their own opinions with every right to express them. We could take the other tack…such men have control issues and when they find they can’t control thoughts, words or actions in women they can’t look to themselves and their attitudes or own beliefs but blame it all on a myth. Fortunately, there are many more men…these days…who find that excuse as feeble as I do, as many women (in or out of ‘comfortable shoes’) do.
Step out of the dark ages, gentlemen…take responsibility for the fact that you are getting back only what you believe you can freely dish without consequence. Truly successful women…just like Dr. Janet…get where they are on their own merit…because they use a brain, not a womb or Dad, brother, husband to get where they want to be. The “strong male figures” such as one describes didn’t get it for her, leading the way while pretending to be Rambo. And the entire point of the discussion which followed Colley’s editorial is that no Dad, brother, son or husband…or any other male…has any need or right to think they must “rein them in”. Whether Dr. Janet was right or wrong…and I happen to believe what she did was wrong…it has nothing to do with any husband to blame for, or right, that wrong. Such pronouncements give your “opinions” little value or credence.
October 26th, 2007 at 10:02 am
Nancy, a college administrator does answer to trustees and to a lesser degree faculty. The silence from these people is bellowing over the peninsula. Your own views about men cloud the root point of the discussion.
October 26th, 2007 at 10:03 am
Women do have wombs but men have penises. One would believe that the male appendage IS THE BRAIN of the man who thinks that women are inferior creatures. Bet this one will not get posted, thanks for your contribution Nancy, you are right on !!!!
October 26th, 2007 at 11:29 am
Yes, Bill…I can and do agree with whom a college administrator must answer or justify her actions or behaviours to as well as the fact their silence is deafening but it was not “my own views about men”…(you have no idea what they are, anyway, since I was not generalizing about ALL men) which clouded the point. You were doing fine until you felt the need to demean and, certainly, insinuate that a man’s purpose is to bring women to heel then, if they can’t or don’t, they are less than. You don’t just demean women or a regular basis…you diminish the men who are sure enough of themselves to see women alongside, not three paces behind.
October 26th, 2007 at 7:44 pm
Nancy, you summed it all up. The problem is that ALL men do not think like him. There are only a handful of men that feel the way he does, thank goodness. Many men have a great amount of respect for women in the jobs they hold, in the raising of their children, their community service, etc. For him to generalize that all women act crazy just because of their “wombs’, “menopause”, etc. has reached the point of becoming ugly. Except for today when it was “football day”, the whole program has been dedicated to mostly the blog and the comments made on it. Even the regular listeners are calling in and saying “I am not a chauvanist pig, but”. It is time to bury the hatchet. Perhaps Mr. Bill will quit dissing the women and the posters like myself will ease up also because I really do think all our feelings and points have been made. I never heard these kind of comments from either Dan or Jared or Bill, especially not Maria. nor the prior afternoon hosts. We have heard this discussion for the last several weeks. It is time for it to STOP and I hope it can do so…….