<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remembering War&#8217;s Wounded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2007/12/21/remembering-wars-wounded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2007/12/21/remembering-wars-wounded/</link>
	<description>The WGMD 92.7 FM Delmarva Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2007/12/21/remembering-wars-wounded/#comment-14611</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 01:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2007/12/21/remembering-wars-wounded/#comment-14611</guid>
		<description>Of course we must remember our war's wounded, but we should also examine the policy behind the wound, while insisting that our wounded be looked after.  25% of our homeless are veterans!  Thus, we need to do much, much  more.

Otherwise a good editorial, however I do have a problem with the assumption that "armed vigilence" includes a preemptive attack on a sovereign nation.  To me, armed vigilence is an appropriate defensive position, to be ready to step up if attacked.  This has not been the case with the foreign policies we've permitted ourselves to be involved in off and on for the last 60 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we must remember our war&#8217;s wounded, but we should also examine the policy behind the wound, while insisting that our wounded be looked after.  25% of our homeless are veterans!  Thus, we need to do much, much  more.</p>
<p>Otherwise a good editorial, however I do have a problem with the assumption that &#8220;armed vigilence&#8221; includes a preemptive attack on a sovereign nation.  To me, armed vigilence is an appropriate defensive position, to be ready to step up if attacked.  This has not been the case with the foreign policies we&#8217;ve permitted ourselves to be involved in off and on for the last 60 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
