Royal We and Serfdom
Thursday, January 31st, 2008Tell me please if the woman has already been President why is she allowed a third term? The question rattled through my head as I watched the latest Democrat Party debate. Wolf Blitzer had just asked Hillary Rodham-Clinton if she had been naive when getting on board with the Iraqi war. As she meandered along some other talking points in giving her response she reflected that “we” bombed Saddam in 1998. This is persistent in Rodham-Clinton’s claims that she has already served 2 terms as Commander-in-Chief. Yet moments later when asked a question about her spouse the royal we came to an abrupt halt. Now she distances herself from her co-President.Â
 For those of you just arriving at this page you need to understand that I’ve decidedly libertarian-conservative leanings. In no way do I support any member of the Democrat Party campaigning for President. Mr. Obama is a nice man and I respect his earnestness but I just don’t get the liberal infatuation with Mrs. Rodham-Clinton. I hear from Democrats constantly decrying the war. Obama opposed it from the start and Mrs. Rodham-Clinton has a much different story. Therefore, no war opposing Democrat should offer her allegiance. What gives here? A vote for the woman is hypocrisy. It’s a vote for the status quo. She’s the candidate of the much hated establishment. “The Man”, if you will, from the language of her generation, which was common when said generation occupied college campuses and occupied campus administrative offices.Â
You’ll also notice “Democrat Party”. If it were “Democratic” there wouldn’t be super-delegates. These are the people selected to give Mrs. Rodham-Clinton the nomination if the rank and file dare slip into the Obama camp. The so called party of the people is adopting some very authoritarian pretensions. Conservatives are incensed the Republican Party may select John McCain but if by Wednesday morning he’s the apparent then the party will abide by the voices of Main Street. I’ve been in media for 22 years and I’ve made a great many observations. One thing very clear to me is the shift among Democrats to a passion for big money, country clubs and celebrities. How does this serve people like me, trying to support a little girl on a broadcaster’s salary? Steven Spielberg was in the crowd at the CNN debate. We’ve nothing in common and he couldn’t begin to fathom the gyrations my mind does when it comes time to pay the bills and, as I write the checks, consider what groceries I can skip to meet my obligations.Â
You’ll notice I’m a libertarian-conservative but not a Republican. I’m weary of a party now joining the crowd and taking money from my pocket to support its addiction to earmarks, many of these excused with claims I’ll benefit. The beneficiaries are all well connected developers, lobbyists and cronies. Last week I by chance stumbled across some old tapes of Ronald Reagan speaking on behalf of the Goldwater campaign 44 years ago. Reagan spoke of a government getting out of the way to allow citizens to make mistakes, mistakes we learn from. An example would be you don’t sign a mortgage for a McMansion on a McDonald’s paycheck. You’ve now been educated and it isn’t my responsibility to bail you out. Your church may offer some solace and it’s possible I’ve helped your church and now you can help the rest of us by ignoring the promises of Rodham-Clinton, Obama and any Republican offering candy for a ride in the car. Judas Priest, my friends, we can do better. There is an old cliché about folks getting the government they deserve. I’m sure this is true because few of you saw the debate. You were watching another channel hoping for an update on Miss Spears, Mark Harmon or the dead actor whose picture adorns all the celebrity rags I saw at the grocery checkout on the way home from work. My thoughts weren’t with that fellow as I was distracted by the cost of my 4 items.Â
Responses are welcome. Goodnight.
Â










