<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jud Bennett vs. Mark Baker Sussex County Council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/</link>
	<description>The WGMD 92.7 FM Delmarva Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sensible sussex</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34514</link>
		<dc:creator>sensible sussex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34514</guid>
		<description>Regarding first time local homebuyers:  My son qualified for low interest loans thru a State program and most lenders in our area are familiar with the program.  In some cases, a buyer with good credit is able to qualify for 100% financing and/or a low down payment.  There may be additional money to help with the Closing Costs.  Many homes and townhomes in our area have experienced a large reduction in price.  Talk to a Realtor or a Lender.  Everyone should be familiar with the program.  My concern is also with the elderly since our population is projected to be mostly retirees due to the lower tax base structure in Delaware.  If Judd puts restrictions on development, does that mean he will also vote down assisted living projects and nursing homes??

Regarding growth:  If you sit thru a Council Meeting, you will see that the County has made productive changes for communities to have open space, walking and bike paths.  They have also voted down projects or placed stipulations that improve the development.   And regarding signs - DELDOT does have stipulations and enforces the guidelines.

If the State imposes their views here (and Judd Bennet's too) there will be no affordable housing due to "Level 4" areas.  What this means is that you will not be able to build a home unless you have a larger piece of land - say 4 or 5 or even 10 acres.  Will that help first time homebuyers?  It's doubtful.  Not only will you have to pay for more ground, you will also pay to commute to work and have to pay to gas up a riding lawn mower.  Not the best time to do that in my opinion.  If you have children, don't forget all those trips to the doctor, school and church functions.  More wear and tear on the car with soaring fuel prices.  And lets not forget the farmers who want to get out of the business so their children don't have to take a gamble on the weather each year.  Ultimately, in "Level 4" the farmer's land will depreciate even more.  Yes, we are experiencing a slump in the real estate market and most of the developers are gone too.  But there are many approved yet unrecorded lots on the books and eventually they will loose those approvals.  In other words yet another correction in the marketplace which will ultimately decrease the number of approved projects on the books.  Do we want Judd making decisions about who has the right to represent the property owners who have - like him been around for years?  

And a reminder for those whiners who came from Virginia, DC, Maryland, NY and Philly and protest development.   Mostly I hear that you've been here maybe 3, 4 and some 12 years.  If it were not for development, you would not have your home with the lowest tax base in the U.S. and I would not have to listen to you say you are against development the next time you swing your golf club or hop on your boat.  And thanks to development, we have better libraries, grocery stores, restaurants and some of the best doctors - who could have lived anywhere but chose to raise their families here.  Lets not be hippocrites or forget us locals who do appreciate the positives that our reputable Council has done to work for us.  

And now, thanks to development a few of our talented kids have come home from college to work and they too care what happens in this community.  These are the kid who guarded our beaches, rented umbrellas, waited tables each summer, worked on the charter fishing boats and enjoyed going to the State Parks or the movies when they weren't crowded.  And the great news is that they are intelligent and understand progress. It's a different way of life here.  We don't want bullies, we want intelligent rational people doing what is right in our community. 

Our Country was founded because of property rights.  Lets not forget the "Boston Tea Party".  There is enough depressing news in the paper and on T.V.  Don't make things worse here.  We want to retain our property rights.  Just as our Ancestors did.

Mark Baker is my choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding first time local homebuyers:  My son qualified for low interest loans thru a State program and most lenders in our area are familiar with the program.  In some cases, a buyer with good credit is able to qualify for 100% financing and/or a low down payment.  There may be additional money to help with the Closing Costs.  Many homes and townhomes in our area have experienced a large reduction in price.  Talk to a Realtor or a Lender.  Everyone should be familiar with the program.  My concern is also with the elderly since our population is projected to be mostly retirees due to the lower tax base structure in Delaware.  If Judd puts restrictions on development, does that mean he will also vote down assisted living projects and nursing homes??</p>
<p>Regarding growth:  If you sit thru a Council Meeting, you will see that the County has made productive changes for communities to have open space, walking and bike paths.  They have also voted down projects or placed stipulations that improve the development.   And regarding signs - DELDOT does have stipulations and enforces the guidelines.</p>
<p>If the State imposes their views here (and Judd Bennet&#8217;s too) there will be no affordable housing due to &#8220;Level 4&#8243; areas.  What this means is that you will not be able to build a home unless you have a larger piece of land - say 4 or 5 or even 10 acres.  Will that help first time homebuyers?  It&#8217;s doubtful.  Not only will you have to pay for more ground, you will also pay to commute to work and have to pay to gas up a riding lawn mower.  Not the best time to do that in my opinion.  If you have children, don&#8217;t forget all those trips to the doctor, school and church functions.  More wear and tear on the car with soaring fuel prices.  And lets not forget the farmers who want to get out of the business so their children don&#8217;t have to take a gamble on the weather each year.  Ultimately, in &#8220;Level 4&#8243; the farmer&#8217;s land will depreciate even more.  Yes, we are experiencing a slump in the real estate market and most of the developers are gone too.  But there are many approved yet unrecorded lots on the books and eventually they will loose those approvals.  In other words yet another correction in the marketplace which will ultimately decrease the number of approved projects on the books.  Do we want Judd making decisions about who has the right to represent the property owners who have - like him been around for years?  </p>
<p>And a reminder for those whiners who came from Virginia, DC, Maryland, NY and Philly and protest development.   Mostly I hear that you&#8217;ve been here maybe 3, 4 and some 12 years.  If it were not for development, you would not have your home with the lowest tax base in the U.S. and I would not have to listen to you say you are against development the next time you swing your golf club or hop on your boat.  And thanks to development, we have better libraries, grocery stores, restaurants and some of the best doctors - who could have lived anywhere but chose to raise their families here.  Lets not be hippocrites or forget us locals who do appreciate the positives that our reputable Council has done to work for us.  </p>
<p>And now, thanks to development a few of our talented kids have come home from college to work and they too care what happens in this community.  These are the kid who guarded our beaches, rented umbrellas, waited tables each summer, worked on the charter fishing boats and enjoyed going to the State Parks or the movies when they weren&#8217;t crowded.  And the great news is that they are intelligent and understand progress. It&#8217;s a different way of life here.  We don&#8217;t want bullies, we want intelligent rational people doing what is right in our community. </p>
<p>Our Country was founded because of property rights.  Lets not forget the &#8220;Boston Tea Party&#8221;.  There is enough depressing news in the paper and on T.V.  Don&#8217;t make things worse here.  We want to retain our property rights.  Just as our Ancestors did.</p>
<p>Mark Baker is my choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humphrey_Plowjogger</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34455</link>
		<dc:creator>Humphrey_Plowjogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34455</guid>
		<description>How about the jobs, entertainment, and healthcare benefits that this growth has brought? Are you guys on pensions or do you work for a living? Has the company you work for been here for more than 5 years? Do your children have an opportunity to get a job now? 

I can remember even 5 years ago when kids would go off to college and not come back simply because there were no jobs to be had. The boardwalk in Rehoboth was literally boarded up after Labor Day!

We had no jobs, we had no healthcare, and we had nothing to do. Now that we're going through a national real estate recession, most of our working class folks are struggling to look for a job. There's no building going on, people are hungry and looking for work. Small family businesses with strong and deep roots are looking at making difficult choices between closing up shop staying here and getting into a different line of work, or moving away.

Our economy is struggling. Bennett would just be the coup de grace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the jobs, entertainment, and healthcare benefits that this growth has brought? Are you guys on pensions or do you work for a living? Has the company you work for been here for more than 5 years? Do your children have an opportunity to get a job now? </p>
<p>I can remember even 5 years ago when kids would go off to college and not come back simply because there were no jobs to be had. The boardwalk in Rehoboth was literally boarded up after Labor Day!</p>
<p>We had no jobs, we had no healthcare, and we had nothing to do. Now that we&#8217;re going through a national real estate recession, most of our working class folks are struggling to look for a job. There&#8217;s no building going on, people are hungry and looking for work. Small family businesses with strong and deep roots are looking at making difficult choices between closing up shop staying here and getting into a different line of work, or moving away.</p>
<p>Our economy is struggling. Bennett would just be the coup de grace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34443</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34443</guid>
		<description>Right, Scott.  

Moreover, the point that Dan didn't get with the lady caller worried about "unbridled" development was trying to make is that infrastructure must be synchronized by the County Council with development, otherwise we have grid-locked highways, inadequate emergency services, inadequate police protection, soon to be overcrowded schools, insufficient enforcement of county ordinances re drainage, set backs, sewers, water supplies, etc.

Your intimidation of this lady was not consistent with the good job you did in handling the debate and the subsequent calls.  You pressed her to identify one bad development.  She was not fast enough on her feet to redirect you back to the infrastructure issue which she was trying to raise.  At times, you need to be more sensitive.

PS: Jud Bennett is trying to address these issues now before they come back and hit us in the face too late with much higher taxes.  This is the concern of a true fiscal Conservative.  How can we have high expectations for Mark Baker who doesn't even know if the County Council meetings begin with a prayer.  You can be sure that Jud knows, as he has attended numerous Council meetings over the years.  Mark Davis is a novice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, Scott.  </p>
<p>Moreover, the point that Dan didn&#8217;t get with the lady caller worried about &#8220;unbridled&#8221; development was trying to make is that infrastructure must be synchronized by the County Council with development, otherwise we have grid-locked highways, inadequate emergency services, inadequate police protection, soon to be overcrowded schools, insufficient enforcement of county ordinances re drainage, set backs, sewers, water supplies, etc.</p>
<p>Your intimidation of this lady was not consistent with the good job you did in handling the debate and the subsequent calls.  You pressed her to identify one bad development.  She was not fast enough on her feet to redirect you back to the infrastructure issue which she was trying to raise.  At times, you need to be more sensitive.</p>
<p>PS: Jud Bennett is trying to address these issues now before they come back and hit us in the face too late with much higher taxes.  This is the concern of a true fiscal Conservative.  How can we have high expectations for Mark Baker who doesn&#8217;t even know if the County Council meetings begin with a prayer.  You can be sure that Jud knows, as he has attended numerous Council meetings over the years.  Mark Davis is a novice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34428</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34428</guid>
		<description>684Jordan wrote:

"limiting growth to certain areas, or any similar ideas, WILL be negative for Sussex in my eyes".

Then you may want to contact Mark Baker and ask his campaign why they are touting the Sussex County Comprehensive plan as controlling growth in a recent radio add against Jud (who claims we don't have a plan to control growth)

I personally find it hard to believe that anyone supports the countless huge poorly planned development projects that are cluttering up our two lane country roads with no attempt to maintain adequate infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>684Jordan wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;limiting growth to certain areas, or any similar ideas, WILL be negative for Sussex in my eyes&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then you may want to contact Mark Baker and ask his campaign why they are touting the Sussex County Comprehensive plan as controlling growth in a recent radio add against Jud (who claims we don&#8217;t have a plan to control growth)</p>
<p>I personally find it hard to believe that anyone supports the countless huge poorly planned development projects that are cluttering up our two lane country roads with no attempt to maintain adequate infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewes Fisherman</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34421</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewes Fisherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34421</guid>
		<description>Is it true that Jud Bennett has been bankrupt several times?  Its not that I care about his past mistakes, but I heard him say he now has "lots of money".  Bankruptsy allows a person to get out of paying financial obligations, so they may keep their house. My questions is: "Jud, Now that you have "lots of money" are you going to pay back the people you stiffed?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it true that Jud Bennett has been bankrupt several times?  Its not that I care about his past mistakes, but I heard him say he now has &#8220;lots of money&#8221;.  Bankruptsy allows a person to get out of paying financial obligations, so they may keep their house. My questions is: &#8220;Jud, Now that you have &#8220;lots of money&#8221; are you going to pay back the people you stiffed?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34353</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34353</guid>
		<description>Oops, correction, it's two attorneys, not five.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, correction, it&#8217;s two attorneys, not five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34352</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34352</guid>
		<description>Jordon says: &lt;i&gt;"So what I have gotten out of Jud’s plans are that taxes will go up, land will become even more unaffordable for our young and old for that matter Sussex Countians, and developers will be driven away from our area by restrictions."&lt;/i&gt;

Who says taxes will go up?  Even his opponent has not make that case.  For example, Jud has shown that the hiring of the five attorneys will actually save taxpayer money.  Jud is a long time fiscal Conservative -- you can bet he will squeeze every ounce of return from every taxpayer dollar spent.  His opponent is a short-timer with little vision or passion.

Continuing on taxes, Jud is trying to prevent taxes from increasing, on farmers too, by demanding that the developers pay their fair share of infrastructure costs at the outset.  You know already in these lean times that the reserve fund is disappearing.  What is his opponent's solution? -- more of the same, as Jody Hudson, President of the PGA seems to dictate!  Jody Hudson does not speak for me, nor do I think he speaks for most of us who love this place, farmers, land owners, and you and me.

Developers adapt to whatever the restrictions are, they always have and always will.  Restrictions are put in place to allow for a managed growth approach to be followed for the benefit of all, farmers, developers, existing home owners.  This has happened already numerous times all across the country, and it can happen here too.  The wheel does not have to be reinvented here.

Who says land/housing is unaffordable?  Jordan thinks so.  I disagree.  Mike Mock makes a valid point about the current situation of supply outstripping demand.  This is a buyers market, a good time for Jordan and others like him to buy in.  You can't necessarily expect to start in the home of your dreams, Jordan, so you start with a condo or a fixer up (I'm sure your Dad can help, Jordan)), or a double wide in a well managed park.  That's exactly the same way it was for me in my first home, a row housee in suburban Philly 48 years ago.  It was a real stretch for me at the time, $10,000, but most of us have to stretch to start out.  In that respect, times have not changed at all.

Even farmers don't benefit when 2 on 1 sprout up here there and everywhere, because they will pay in increased land taxes not too much longer down the line, as Jud is trying to point out.

I'm for Jud, because he is one of the few willing to stand up and warn us of the consequences down the road if we don't do a better job of planning right now.  And he has a plan.  His opponent, however, is very shortsighted, because he wants more of the same.  That's negligent, in my view.  And what is his opponent's plan?  I have yet to see one!

Jud's message is the tough one and takes courage, because he is calling for change; his opponent's is the easy one, because he is calling for more of the same.  Shoot, I could do that!!!

Let us be foresighted and make the tough calls now, farmers, land owners, and homeowners alike, so that we take proper care of the land here that we cherish, so that we can protect ourselves from high taxes not too far down the road.  This is the message of a true fiscal Conservative, and of a truly passionate lover of our County and State!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordon says: <i>&#8220;So what I have gotten out of Jud’s plans are that taxes will go up, land will become even more unaffordable for our young and old for that matter Sussex Countians, and developers will be driven away from our area by restrictions.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Who says taxes will go up?  Even his opponent has not make that case.  For example, Jud has shown that the hiring of the five attorneys will actually save taxpayer money.  Jud is a long time fiscal Conservative &#8212; you can bet he will squeeze every ounce of return from every taxpayer dollar spent.  His opponent is a short-timer with little vision or passion.</p>
<p>Continuing on taxes, Jud is trying to prevent taxes from increasing, on farmers too, by demanding that the developers pay their fair share of infrastructure costs at the outset.  You know already in these lean times that the reserve fund is disappearing.  What is his opponent&#8217;s solution? &#8212; more of the same, as Jody Hudson, President of the PGA seems to dictate!  Jody Hudson does not speak for me, nor do I think he speaks for most of us who love this place, farmers, land owners, and you and me.</p>
<p>Developers adapt to whatever the restrictions are, they always have and always will.  Restrictions are put in place to allow for a managed growth approach to be followed for the benefit of all, farmers, developers, existing home owners.  This has happened already numerous times all across the country, and it can happen here too.  The wheel does not have to be reinvented here.</p>
<p>Who says land/housing is unaffordable?  Jordan thinks so.  I disagree.  Mike Mock makes a valid point about the current situation of supply outstripping demand.  This is a buyers market, a good time for Jordan and others like him to buy in.  You can&#8217;t necessarily expect to start in the home of your dreams, Jordan, so you start with a condo or a fixer up (I&#8217;m sure your Dad can help, Jordan)), or a double wide in a well managed park.  That&#8217;s exactly the same way it was for me in my first home, a row housee in suburban Philly 48 years ago.  It was a real stretch for me at the time, $10,000, but most of us have to stretch to start out.  In that respect, times have not changed at all.</p>
<p>Even farmers don&#8217;t benefit when 2 on 1 sprout up here there and everywhere, because they will pay in increased land taxes not too much longer down the line, as Jud is trying to point out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m for Jud, because he is one of the few willing to stand up and warn us of the consequences down the road if we don&#8217;t do a better job of planning right now.  And he has a plan.  His opponent, however, is very shortsighted, because he wants more of the same.  That&#8217;s negligent, in my view.  And what is his opponent&#8217;s plan?  I have yet to see one!</p>
<p>Jud&#8217;s message is the tough one and takes courage, because he is calling for change; his opponent&#8217;s is the easy one, because he is calling for more of the same.  Shoot, I could do that!!!</p>
<p>Let us be foresighted and make the tough calls now, farmers, land owners, and homeowners alike, so that we take proper care of the land here that we cherish, so that we can protect ourselves from high taxes not too far down the road.  This is the message of a true fiscal Conservative, and of a truly passionate lover of our County and State!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 684jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34348</link>
		<dc:creator>684jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34348</guid>
		<description>Property value may be declining, but it is declining from a REDICULOUS value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Property value may be declining, but it is declining from a REDICULOUS value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikemock</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34344</link>
		<dc:creator>mikemock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34344</guid>
		<description>I am a developer in Sussex County, for over 25 years.  It is true that it is difficult for a local raised, locally employed 25 year old has difficulty buying a new houe.  All 25 year olds have difficulty buying a new house.  No matter what the price, you need a twenty percent downpayment, a good credit history and sufficient income to pay the mortgage as well as any other payments.  Typically, a 25 year old has not put all of those pieces in place.
Property rights, particularly those allowing farmers to subdivide their property into 2 houses per acre, are on the front burner.  Farmers argue that they lose the value of their land if they lose the right to produce 2 houses per acre.  The value of their land is determined by one thing.  The price a ready, willing and able buyer is likely to pay under normal circumstances.
Right now, developers are out of the market.  Permission to build 30 houses per acre won't increase the value because there are no buyers.
Banks lend money to farmers based upon the market value of their property and equipment.
If farmers want their value to be protected or restored, with the belief that developers will pay the highest price, we have to fix the problems preventing developers from being in the market.  That is excessive inventory.
Sussex County Council approves 6,000 new lots per year, 16 per day, one every 90 minutes, day in and day out.  Under the best of times, we use 2,000 per year.
The past two years have seen values fall at least $50,000 per house, $25,000 per year, $64 per day, $4 per lot.
Every 90 minutes, a new lot is created and each house in Sussex County goes down in value $4.  
There are 125,000 parcels.  As a county, we lose $500,000 in value every 90 minutes, $8,000,000 per day, our tax base is shrinking.
Will this make housing prices fall, yes.  Will it make affordable housing more available? No.
The market is created and governed by principles.  One of those principles is that someone must buy, value must increase, demand must overtake supply.
The system in place is self destructive.
Banks won't lend money to people whose property value is declining.  The decline will not stop until we stop spitting out lots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a developer in Sussex County, for over 25 years.  It is true that it is difficult for a local raised, locally employed 25 year old has difficulty buying a new houe.  All 25 year olds have difficulty buying a new house.  No matter what the price, you need a twenty percent downpayment, a good credit history and sufficient income to pay the mortgage as well as any other payments.  Typically, a 25 year old has not put all of those pieces in place.<br />
Property rights, particularly those allowing farmers to subdivide their property into 2 houses per acre, are on the front burner.  Farmers argue that they lose the value of their land if they lose the right to produce 2 houses per acre.  The value of their land is determined by one thing.  The price a ready, willing and able buyer is likely to pay under normal circumstances.<br />
Right now, developers are out of the market.  Permission to build 30 houses per acre won&#8217;t increase the value because there are no buyers.<br />
Banks lend money to farmers based upon the market value of their property and equipment.<br />
If farmers want their value to be protected or restored, with the belief that developers will pay the highest price, we have to fix the problems preventing developers from being in the market.  That is excessive inventory.<br />
Sussex County Council approves 6,000 new lots per year, 16 per day, one every 90 minutes, day in and day out.  Under the best of times, we use 2,000 per year.<br />
The past two years have seen values fall at least $50,000 per house, $25,000 per year, $64 per day, $4 per lot.<br />
Every 90 minutes, a new lot is created and each house in Sussex County goes down in value $4.<br />
There are 125,000 parcels.  As a county, we lose $500,000 in value every 90 minutes, $8,000,000 per day, our tax base is shrinking.<br />
Will this make housing prices fall, yes.  Will it make affordable housing more available? No.<br />
The market is created and governed by principles.  One of those principles is that someone must buy, value must increase, demand must overtake supply.<br />
The system in place is self destructive.<br />
Banks won&#8217;t lend money to people whose property value is declining.  The decline will not stop until we stop spitting out lots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 684jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/08/28/jud-bennett-vs-mark-baker-sussex-county-council/#comment-34340</link>
		<dc:creator>684jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wgmd.com/blog/?p=1867#comment-34340</guid>
		<description>I think I can discuss this topic from an interesting perspective. I am a 24 year old from Sussex County...born and raised, and what I see is this: Mr. Bennett is an excellent canidate, from the normal everyday persons standpoint. I am not at all speaking down on "average citezens" but I believe that Mr. Bennett gets many votes because his angles sound good to the "average citezens" that aren't deeply devoted to local or national politics. My number one concern is this: In talking to my friends, they say they like Jud because he is going to "stop" development, and to an uninformed person, stopping development and saving the open space sounds great. But no matter which way you look at it, either making developers fully responsible for infastructure, or limiting growth to certain areas, or any similar ideas, WILL be negative for Sussex in my eyes. I like many others, dream that we could freeze building and development and go on with normal everday lives with no effect. But that is not realistic. I think that restrictions/revisions that Jud has offered will push developers, and even more, quality developers from the area. And what I believe is going to be even worse: Land prices in Sussex are almost 100% unaffordable for young Sussex Countians as they are now, and realisticly, they aren't going to drop much. The only way that Born and Raised Sussex Countians are building houses where they grew up and want to live, is if they are lucky enough to be given a house or property by a family member. I know this first hand as I was given land by my father, after and long and unsuccessful search for an affordable home here. If Mr. Bennett makes developers pay several million more dollars out of pocket for infastructure, what are the lot prices going to do? And if only certain areas are available for development, what will happen to the land prices in the limited developable areas? Moreover, what will happen to the farmers investments..(land), if developers shy away from buying thier land because of these reasons? I believe that the operating costs for the county are going to go up regardless of how many new people come here. Therefore, if we aren't getting new landowners/homeowner/taxpayers, our taxes will surely continue to rise. 
So what I have gotten out of Jud's plans are that taxes will go up, land will become even more unaffordable for our young and old for that matter Sussex Countians, and developers will be driven away from our area by restrictions. But all of this, I believe sounds great to the everyday Sussex Countian that heres...Jud Bennett wants to slow development, make the developer pay, and hire lawyers to make sure it all gets done..!!??? I know that Jud or no one close to him has mentioned this, but I pray that Jud doesn't think that Republicans "owe" him thier vote simply because he didn't make it last time, Mark Baker gets my vote without question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I can discuss this topic from an interesting perspective. I am a 24 year old from Sussex County&#8230;born and raised, and what I see is this: Mr. Bennett is an excellent canidate, from the normal everyday persons standpoint. I am not at all speaking down on &#8220;average citezens&#8221; but I believe that Mr. Bennett gets many votes because his angles sound good to the &#8220;average citezens&#8221; that aren&#8217;t deeply devoted to local or national politics. My number one concern is this: In talking to my friends, they say they like Jud because he is going to &#8220;stop&#8221; development, and to an uninformed person, stopping development and saving the open space sounds great. But no matter which way you look at it, either making developers fully responsible for infastructure, or limiting growth to certain areas, or any similar ideas, WILL be negative for Sussex in my eyes. I like many others, dream that we could freeze building and development and go on with normal everday lives with no effect. But that is not realistic. I think that restrictions/revisions that Jud has offered will push developers, and even more, quality developers from the area. And what I believe is going to be even worse: Land prices in Sussex are almost 100% unaffordable for young Sussex Countians as they are now, and realisticly, they aren&#8217;t going to drop much. The only way that Born and Raised Sussex Countians are building houses where they grew up and want to live, is if they are lucky enough to be given a house or property by a family member. I know this first hand as I was given land by my father, after and long and unsuccessful search for an affordable home here. If Mr. Bennett makes developers pay several million more dollars out of pocket for infastructure, what are the lot prices going to do? And if only certain areas are available for development, what will happen to the land prices in the limited developable areas? Moreover, what will happen to the farmers investments..(land), if developers shy away from buying thier land because of these reasons? I believe that the operating costs for the county are going to go up regardless of how many new people come here. Therefore, if we aren&#8217;t getting new landowners/homeowner/taxpayers, our taxes will surely continue to rise.<br />
So what I have gotten out of Jud&#8217;s plans are that taxes will go up, land will become even more unaffordable for our young and old for that matter Sussex Countians, and developers will be driven away from our area by restrictions. But all of this, I believe sounds great to the everyday Sussex Countian that heres&#8230;Jud Bennett wants to slow development, make the developer pay, and hire lawyers to make sure it all gets done..!!??? I know that Jud or no one close to him has mentioned this, but I pray that Jud doesn&#8217;t think that Republicans &#8220;owe&#8221; him thier vote simply because he didn&#8217;t make it last time, Mark Baker gets my vote without question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
